A Social Equity Analysis of the U.S. Public Transportation System Based on Job Accessibility by Armin Jeddi YeganehIn this article, Armin Yeganeh, an Asian-American Professor at Michigan State University, speaks on job accessibility and it’s influence on salary. We are in a place where refurbishing an aging highway system is no longer sufficient. Refurbishing the highway may address physical issues with the highway, but it does not address the larger issues. Congestion and air pollution would still be an issue, and more importantly, it would not address the equity and accessibility needs. The highway system negatively impacts poor people and people of color, and investment in it starves public transportation of funding. In the past years, people have sought to move from a focus on mobility to a focus on accessibility. This article took data from transportation use in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) to figure out the trends and equity issues in the transportation sector. Accessibility is based on proximity to jobs, frequency of jobs, and amount of time it takes to get to jobs. An equation that was weighted on population found that white people have the lowest mean job accessibility (MJA), as in they have the highest travel time/distance; however, they make up most of the higher-paid workforce. Of the people making a salary of 225,000 or above, 79.6% were white, 10.6% were Asian, 5.5% were Hispanic, and only 1.6% were black. To give more context, white people only make up 50.4% of the total documented workforce. There are systematic hindrances, ones that go beyond transportation, on people of color that give them less access to jobs. Even in Kansas City, where transportation is free, only 2.2% of the population uses transit to commute. Free transport, while a step in the right direction, does not guarantee job equality. - Annotation by Aidan Dillon, Spring 2023